<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Topgrading</title>
	<link>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com</link>
	<description>How to interview, hire, and coach high performance teams</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Topgrading for Sales reviewed in Inc. Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/topgrading-for-sales-reviewed-in-inc-magazine/2008/06/09/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/topgrading-for-sales-reviewed-in-inc-magazine/2008/06/09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 20:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mursau</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/topgrading-for-sales-reviewed-in-inc-magazine/2008/06/09/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Topgrading for Sales (Portfolio, June 2008) was reviewed in Inc. Magazine&#8217;s June issue.  It received a &#8220;rigor rating&#8221; of 9 on a 10-point scale, right up there with Jim Collin&#8217;s Good to Great.  The book is Brad&#8217;s latest work and is co-authored by Greg Alexander, a highly-successful sales executive and super-Topgrader.  (If the name sounds [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> </em><em>Topgrading for Sales</em> (Portfolio, June 2008) was reviewed in Inc. Magazine&#8217;s June issue.  It received a &#8220;rigor rating&#8221; of 9 on a 10-point scale, right up there with Jim Collin&#8217;s <em>Good to Great.  </em>The book is Brad&#8217;s latest work and is co-authored by Greg Alexander, a highly-successful sales executive and super-Topgrader.  (If the name sounds familiar, Greg was featured in the 2005 revision of <em>Topgrading</em>). </p>
<p>To read the review in its entirety, go to <a href="http://www.inc.com/magazine/20080601/a-skimmers-guide-to-the-latest-business-books.html">http://www.inc.com/magazine/20080601/a-skimmers-guide-to-the-latest-business-books.html</a>. </p>
<p>For more information on <em>Topgrading for Sales</em> and to order the book, go to <a href="http://www.topgradingforsales.com/">http://www.TopgradingforSales.com</a>.</p>
<p><img align="top" width="96" src="http://www.topgradingforsales.com/images/topgradingbook.png" alt="topgradingbook" height="156" style="width: 96px; height: 156px" title="topgradingbook" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/topgrading-for-sales-reviewed-in-inc-magazine/2008/06/09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Topgrading Improves Your Bottom Line</title>
		<link>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/topgrading-improves-your-bottom-line/2008/05/14/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/topgrading-improves-your-bottom-line/2008/05/14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mursau</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Assessment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[A Players]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hiring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/topgrading-improves-your-bottom-line/2008/05/14/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those Human Resources professionals out there who want to implement Topgrading but are having a tough time convincing &#8220;the organization&#8221; it is worth the time and money, here is a suggestion that may help you significantly.  Figure out how much value a Topgrading Initiative will add to the bottom line and let the data help [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Georgia">For those Human Resources professionals out there who want to implement Topgrading but are having a tough time convincing &#8220;the organization&#8221; it is worth the time and money, here is a suggestion that may help you significantly.  Figure out how much value a Topgrading Initiative will add to the bottom line and let the data help you persuade others.  </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Georgia"></span><span style="font-family: Georgia">Here are the steps:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Georgia"></span><span style="font-family: Georgia">1. Spend 15-20 minutes with management team members working through a cost of mishire exercise.  Average those costs for each level of management.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Georgia"></span><span style="font-family: Georgia">2. Ask each of those managers you meet with in Step 1 their opinion of the organization&#8217;s hiring success (&#8221;When we hire from the outside, what percentage of the time do those people turn out to be A players, high performers that fit our culture?&#8221;)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Georgia"></span><span style="font-family: Georgia">3. Plug the numbers into this equation: (100% - Average hiring success rate) x number of hires per year x Average cost of mishire = Annual cost of mishire (at this level).  Do this for each level and you have the total annual cost of mishire to the organization.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Georgia"></span><span style="font-family: Georgia">4. Estimate how implementing Job Scorecards, the Career History Form, Tandem Topgrading Interview, and In-Depth Reference Checks will impact hiring success.  For instance, if you find that the current hiring success rate is about 30% and you plan to do the implementation without professional assistance, you could expect to improve to 60% success in the first year.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Georgia"></span><span style="font-family: Georgia">5. Calculate how the improvement in hiring success will reduce the cost of mishires, and from there you can calculate an ROI for a Topgrading implementation.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Georgia">Here is an example of a company that has a 30% hiring success rate, hires 10 managers per year, and has an average cost of mishire of $500K</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Georgia"><span style="font-family: Georgia">Total current annual cost of mishires = $3,500,000</span></span><span style="font-family: Georgia"></span><span style="font-family: Georgia"></span><span style="font-family: Georgia"></p>
<table border="1" cellPadding="0" cellSpacing="0" style="border-collapse: collapse; border: medium none" class="MsoTableGrid">
<tr>
<td width="129" vAlign="top" style="padding-right: 5.4pt; padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0in; width: 96.45pt; padding-top: 0in; background-color: transparent; border: windowtext 1pt solid">
<p align="center"><span style="font-family: Georgia"><font size="3">Hiring Success</font></span></p>
</td>
<td width="204" vAlign="top" style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0in; border-left: #ebe9ed; width: 153pt; padding-top: 0in; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent">
<p align="center"><span style="font-family: Georgia"><font size="3">Total Cost of Mishires</font></span></p>
</td>
<td width="211" vAlign="top" style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0in; border-left: #ebe9ed; width: 2.2in; padding-top: 0in; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent">
<p align="center"><span style="font-family: Georgia"><font size="3">Bottom line improvement</font></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="129" vAlign="top" style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: #ebe9ed; padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0in; border-left: windowtext 1pt solid; width: 96.45pt; padding-top: 0in; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent">
<p align="center"><span style="font-family: Georgia"><font size="3">30% to 60%</font></span></p>
</td>
<td width="204" vAlign="top" style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: #ebe9ed; padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0in; border-left: #ebe9ed; width: 153pt; padding-top: 0in; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent">
<p align="center" style="line-height: 15.6pt; text-align: center"><span style="font-family: Georgia"><font size="3">$3.5M to $2M</font></span></p>
</td>
<td width="211" vAlign="top" style="border-right: windowtext 1pt solid; padding-right: 5.4pt; border-top: #ebe9ed; padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0in; border-left: #ebe9ed; width: 2.2in; padding-top: 0in; border-bottom: windowtext 1pt solid; background-color: transparent">
<p align="center"><span style="font-family: Georgia"><font size="3">$1,500,000</font></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><strong><span style="font-family: Georgia">The ROI will be astronomical. <span> Also, based on our research those are extremely conservative numbers and only address the effect Topgrading will have on external hiring.  The returns will increase exponentially if you implement Topgrading-based processes for promotions and developing incumbent managers!</span><span>  </span></span><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></strong></p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/topgrading-improves-your-bottom-line/2008/05/14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Couple of Recent Topgrading Trends</title>
		<link>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/a-couple-of-recent-topgrading-trends/2008/04/29/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/a-couple-of-recent-topgrading-trends/2008/04/29/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mursau</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[A Players]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/a-couple-of-recent-topgrading-trends/2008/04/29/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though some clients are sticking with the categories A, B, and C player, many have simply begun discussing whether someone is an A player, has the potential to become an A player on a timely basis (usually within a year), or is a non-A player without A potential.  Based on Topgrading&#8217;s definition of A player, a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif'">Though some clients are sticking with the categories A, B, and C player, many have simply begun discussing whether someone is an A player, has the potential to become an A player on a timely basis (usually within a year), or is a non-A player without A potential.  Based on Topgrading&#8217;s definition of A player, a high performer who is in the top 10% of the talent available for the pay, it really doesn&#8217;t matter whether a person is a B or C player - there are A players out there who will do that job for the same compensation <u>and</u> perform at a much higher level.  Research from several sources estimates that a top performer is twice as productive as an average or below average employee.  </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif'">Just keep in mind that A potential is not a perpetual category.  If you deem someone &#8220;A potential&#8221; and that person has not improved enough within a year to be considered an A player, it is probably time to figure out where that person can be a high performer elsewhere.   </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'">Another trend we have noticed, and recommend, is the separation of the administrative accountabilities of the human resources function and talent management.   Too often those administrative responsibilities such as benefits and employee relations take precedence over packing the organization with A players.  The administrative things are often acute problems, fires to be put out now, while having a lower-than-possible percentage of A players in the company is more of a chronic problem.  </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'">Several Topgrading organizations mentioned in previous posts separated those jobs after they began implementation of Topgrading tools and principles.  They realized that managing talent is a big job; a big job that has the potential to have a gigantic positive impact on the organization.  </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Georgia','serif'">Aric Dershem (VP of People Development, National Heritage Academies), Danielle Robinson (Topgrading Director, Rudy&#8217;s Country Store and BBQ), and Travis Isaacson (Director of Organizational Development, Access Development), all have one main focus - increasing the percentage of A players in their respective organizations.  </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/a-couple-of-recent-topgrading-trends/2008/04/29/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Many A Players Do You Have?</title>
		<link>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/how-many-a-players-do-you-have/2008/04/28/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/how-many-a-players-do-you-have/2008/04/28/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mursau</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Assessment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/how-many-a-players-do-you-have/2008/04/28/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Figuring out how many A players are in your organization is a fantastic way to gauge the success of your Topgrading efforts.  However, without doing Topgrading assessments on all of your employees, accurately putting people into those categories can be challenging.
Aric Dershem, Vice President of People Development at National Heritage Academies, gives this advice about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Figuring out how many A players are in your organization is a fantastic way to gauge the success of your Topgrading efforts.  However, without doing Topgrading assessments on all of your employees, accurately putting people into those categories can be challenging.</p>
<p style="line-height: 15.6pt"><span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif'">Aric Dershem, Vice President of People Development at National Heritage Academies, gives this advice about annual talent reviews.  Rather than getting hung up on whether someone is in the top 10% of talent available in the market, ask this question about all of your employees, &#8220;Would I enthusiastically re-hire this person?&#8221;  If the answer is yes <u>and</u> you have high performance standards, that person is probably an A player.  That will get people into categories; describing each person&#8217;s strengths, weaker areas, and potential for development will further refine your list.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/how-many-a-players-do-you-have/2008/04/28/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scrutinize Candidates for Promotion as Thoroughly as External Candidates for Hire</title>
		<link>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/scrutinize-candidates-for-promotion-as-thoroughly-as-external-candidates-for-hire/2008/04/25/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/scrutinize-candidates-for-promotion-as-thoroughly-as-external-candidates-for-hire/2008/04/25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mursau</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Promoting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/scrutinize-candidates-for-promotion-as-thoroughly-as-external-candidates-for-hire/2008/04/25/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of you who have read the latest edition of Topgrading may remember that the statistics on promoting success are as dismal as those on hiring success.  Why?  Too many promotions are based on the candidate&#8217;s performance in their present job.  The candidate&#8217;s strengths and weaknesses in relation to the new job are not scrutinized closely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of you who have read the latest edition of <em>Topgrading</em> may remember that the statistics on promoting success are as dismal as those on hiring success.  Why?  Too many promotions are based on the candidate&#8217;s performance in their present job.  The candidate&#8217;s strengths and weaknesses in relation to the new job are not scrutinized closely enough.  When that happens, too often you get to experience the &#8220;Peter Principal&#8221; first hand.  (The Peter Principle is the idea that employees within an organization will advance to their highest level of competence and then be promoted to and remain at a level at which they are incompetent.)</p>
<p>Next time you consider someone for promotion, especially if that person will be moving from an individual contributor position to a management position, go through the following steps.</p>
<p> First, create a detailed Job Scorecard for the new position if one does not already exist.  Next, conduct a Tandem Topgrading Interview with the candidate.  Ideally, the interview should not be conducted by the candidate&#8217;s current boss.  However, if that is unavoidable, be sure the other interviewer is an unbiased third party.  After the Topgrading Interview, do 360 interviews with 8 to 10 coworkers.  Those 360 interviews should focus on the new job. </p>
<p>Follow that process and you will be as successful in promoting high performers as you are in hiring them. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/scrutinize-candidates-for-promotion-as-thoroughly-as-external-candidates-for-hire/2008/04/25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Topgrading Lacks &#8220;Facts&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/topgrading-lacks-facts/2008/04/18/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/topgrading-lacks-facts/2008/04/18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Smart</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[A Players]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/topgrading-lacks-facts/2008/04/18/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent book, Hard Facts: Dangerous Half-Truths &#38; Total Nonsense, included Topgrading.  What an honor!  Ooops &#8212; it&#8217;s a critical review!  Oh, no, after three decades of helping companies improve from 25% to 90% high performers hired, the &#8220;fact&#8221; is &#8212; Topgrading is all &#8220;BS?&#8221; (my initials, get it?)
The book says, p. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent book, <em><strong>Hard Facts:</strong></em> <strong><em>Dangerous Half-Truths &amp; Total Nonsense, </em></strong>included Topgrading.  What an honor!  Ooops &#8212; it&#8217;s a critical review!  Oh, no, after three decades of helping companies improve from 25% to 90% high performers hired, the &#8220;fact&#8221; is &#8212; Topgrading is all &#8220;BS?&#8221; (my initials, get it?)</p>
<p>The book says, p. 89, &#8220;Smart&#8217;s book <strong><em>Topgrading </em></strong>emphasizes the &#8220;fact&#8221; &#8230; that A players hire A players &#8230;  <em><strong>The War for Talent</strong></em> makes the same point &#8230; We call it the Rule of Crappy People:  Bad <strike>mangers </strike>managers hire very, very bad employees, because they are threatened by anyone who is anywhere near as good as they are.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Duh,&#8221; you say!  Obviously there are exceptions, which I have pointed out in various writings, but does anyone want to seriously challenge something as obvious as A players trying to hire A players?  Maybe college profs think, &#8220;Gee, our C player dean hired A player me!&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, the authors go on to cite research with college kids that really does support the Rule of Crappy People &#8212; conscientious college students tend to <strike>hand </strike>hang out with college students, and a guy I was in my Ph.D. program with (Frank Schmidt) did study showing really smart people tend to hang out with really smart people &#8212; &#8220;certainly part of (Smart&#8217;s) A player profile.&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m being defensive, but get a life, academics!  In the Epilogs of my books I beg the scientific community to research important topics, such as how Topgraders double and triple their hiring success.  I wouldn&#8217;t waste any time trying to scientifically &#8220;prove&#8221; that A players tend to favor A players, and C players tend to favor C players!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/topgrading-lacks-facts/2008/04/18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should you Topgrade entry-level positions?</title>
		<link>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/should-you-topgrade-entry-level-positions/2008/04/17/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/should-you-topgrade-entry-level-positions/2008/04/17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mursau</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[A Players]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/should-you-topgrade-entry-level-positions/2008/04/17/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the opportunity to speak with Marlis Oliver earlier this week. Marlis is the Area Director of K &#38; N Management in Austin, Texas; K &#38; N Management owns four Rudy’s BBQ &#38; Country Stores in the Austin area. Marlis has been instrumental in transforming K &#38; N into a true Topgrading organization.
We often [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the opportunity to speak with Marlis Oliver earlier this week. Marlis is the Area Director of K &amp; N Management in Austin, Texas; K &amp; N Management owns four Rudy’s BBQ &amp; Country Stores in the Austin area. Marlis has been instrumental in transforming K &amp; N into a true Topgrading organization.</p>
<p>We often get asked the question, “Should we Topgrade our organizations from top to bottom?” Marlis would answer that question with a resounding, “Yes!” K &amp; N not only does tandem Topgrading interviews for management candidates, they conduct Topgrading interviews on EVERYONE that joins the organization, including the people that clear the tables and clean the floors in their restaurants. They realized early on that their hourly employees are the ones that have the most contact with customers, making it imperative that they are A players.</p>
<p>The results have been astounding, proving to Marlis and the rest of K &amp; N’s management team that all of the time spent selecting the right people and regularly monitoring their performance has been worthwhile. K &amp; N currently owns four Rudy’s BBQ &amp; Country store franchises; those four locations do more food volume than any other restaurant in Austin, their four locations perform better than other franchise locations…and last year they experienced double digit store growth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/should-you-topgrade-entry-level-positions/2008/04/17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Define what an A player is BEFORE you begin the selection process</title>
		<link>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/define-what-an-a-player-is-before-you-begin-the-selection-process/2008/04/04/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/define-what-an-a-player-is-before-you-begin-the-selection-process/2008/04/04/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mursau</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Job Description/Scorecard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/define-what-an-a-player-is-before-you-begin-the-selection-process/2008/04/04/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is possible to hone your skills as a Topgrading interviewer and still not achieve the level of success in hiring and promoting you expect.  &#8220;How could that possibly be?&#8221; you ask.  If you do not spend some time early on in the selection process defining what A player performance is, you will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is possible to hone your skills as a Topgrading interviewer and still not achieve the level of success in hiring and promoting you expect.  &#8220;How could that possibly be?&#8221; you ask.  If you do not spend some time early on in the selection process defining what A player performance is, you will still have a high probability of putting the wrong person into that job even if you do a fantastic job in the Topgrading interview.</p>
<p>Most managers jump into the selection process without ever clearly defining what an A player &#8220;looks like&#8221; for a given position.  If you do not know exactly who you&#8217;re looking for, it is pretty difficult to know when you have found them.  It is no wonder that most managers experience a dismal hiring and promoting success rate.</p>
<p>You can <u>significantly</u> increase your chances of hiring a high performer by spending an hour or two at the beginning of the selection process to specifically define the <strong>accountabilities</strong> for a given position and the mission-critical <strong>competencies</strong> an A player candidate will exhibit.  You can think of it this way: the accountabilities are the results you expect the candidate to exhibit in the first 12 months on the job and the mission-critical competencies describe the manner in which you expect the results to be delivered.</p>
<p>For example, increasing revenue by 12.5% within 12 months may be an accountabilty for a sales manager.  A few mission-critical competencies for that sales manager candidate may be resourcefulness, tenacity, redeploying B/C players, and customer focus.</p>
<p>Thinking about what results an A player needs to achieve and the behaviors you would like that person to exhibit will get you to your goal of having all high performers on your team quicker than you can imagine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/define-what-an-a-player-is-before-you-begin-the-selection-process/2008/04/04/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How A Players &#8230; Fail!</title>
		<link>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/how-a-players-fail/2008/03/15/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/how-a-players-fail/2008/03/15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Smart</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[A Players]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/how-a-players-fail/2008/03/15/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the cover article (&#8221;Get Your A Players Here&#8221;) in Workforce Management (March 3, 2008), suggests, A Players are winners and Topgrading is the way to get them.  As soon as they release the pdf we&#8217;ll post the article.
 This week people have read the article and I&#8217;ve gotten a bunch of emails asking if A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the cover article (&#8221;Get Your A Players Here&#8221;) in Workforce Management (March 3, 2008), suggests, A Players are winners and Topgrading is the way to get them.  As soon as they release the pdf we&#8217;ll post the article.</p>
<p> This week people have read the article and I&#8217;ve gotten a bunch of emails asking if A players <em>always</em> succeed, and the answer is <em>no!</em>  There are no guarantees that come with embracing topgrading (other than our money-back guarantee on the accuracy of our &#8220;second opinion&#8221; assessments of candidates;  no one has ever requested their money back, incidentally).  But here are a couple of the most common ways a Topgrader can fail:</p>
<p><strong> 1.  Bad luck.</strong></p>
<p>As you know, business involves taking risk.  A players can do all the due diligence in the world to mitigate risk, but they can still fail.  There are plenty of A players at Bear Stearns, UBS, Citi, and Merrill Lynch who are getting terrible results and getting tossed out onto the streets because of the sub-prime virus.  Hey, they <em>all</em> didn&#8217;t cause the mess!</p>
<p>Bad luck comes in the form of new competitors, economic blips, terrorist acts, some country over-protecting competitors in your industry, Congress withdrawing subsidies, Supreme Court vagaries, your coming down with a nasty disease.  Hey,  ca-ca happens.</p>
<p><strong><em>ADVICE:  </em>Hang in there.  A players are resourceful and persistent.  They don&#8217;t give up easily, but when they fail they pick themselves up and move on.  Curt Clawson became CEO of what he thought would be a Good to Great company, but a day after joining Hayes-Lemmerz he discovered accounting irregularities.  Even the board didn&#8217;t know of the problems. The company soon went into Chapter 11; it was bad luck but the company was failing.  It took a couple of years and major change, but today the company has a 1-1 debt/equity ratio,  a strong balance sheet, and a solid future, all because after bad luck Clawson persevered, topgraded, and succeeded. </strong></p>
<p><strong>There is someone you might have thought of as an A player, who just this week said something  like, &#8220;The glory in mankind is rising from the ashes.&#8221;  Elliot Spitzer.  No more A player status for this guy &#8230; he&#8217;s going to have to rise a lot, and avoid those hot ashes (ahem).</strong></p>
<p><strong>2.   Bad boss(es)</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve assessed/coached 6,500 executives, each with an average of 10 jobs, and after asking all the topgrading questions about all the jobs &#8212; how they succeeded/failed/made decisions/etc., I&#8217;ve accumulated 65,000 of those case studies.  Since a high percentage of executives I interview are A players, I&#8217;ve heard a zillion examples in which really sharp executves were hindered because the boss &#8212; imposed a futile strategy, refused to listen to good ideas, failed to topgrade the rest of the team (so peers were C players), or felt threatened and actively undermined the A player.</p>
<p> <strong><em>ADVICE:  </em>If you&#8217;re the A player with a C player boss &#8212; hit the pause button; don&#8217;t hastily quit.  I&#8217;ve seen plenty of C player bosses who eventually performed as A players because they topgraded and assembled a team of A players whom they could trust.  Good for them!  Hey, stick around when that boss says, &#8220;Pat, I&#8217;m putting a together an A team and I&#8217;ll be relying on you and others to help us all succeed;  my job is to topgrade and empower the team so you all have fun, learn a lot, and achieve huge success.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p><strong>A final suggestion &#8212; perform solid due diligence on bosses before changing jobs.  I have a thousand examples in my files of confident A players NOT checking out the boss enough, and failing because of that boss.  Do reference checking &#8212; ask present and past subordinates of the executive you might work for what he/she was like, the good and the bad.</strong></p>
<p><strong> But &#8230; if you find yourself reporting to a chronic C player, look for an exit stategy, either within the company or with another  company.  &#8216;Tis better to slow your career a bit, succeeding in a lesser job, than fail in a bigger job with an excuse that sounds like, and is, an excuse &#8211; &#8220;I failed because I went to work for the wrong boss.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p><strong>                                ANNOUNCEMENT  TO LICENSEES </strong></p>
<p>In a few days we&#8217;re going to send you (free) a revised, turbo-boosted Topgrading Career History Form;  it will save you a LOT of time prescreening candidates and it will assure you will screen IN the A players.  Of course you can choose to make the changes or not. There are 3 changes:</p>
<p>1.  An Introduction that alerts candidates to the TORC Technique, essentially telling them that in order to get a job offer they will probably be asked to arrange personal reference calls with former bosses (which is a hint for them to be totally honest in completing the Topgrading Career History Form).</p>
<p>2.  Boss ratings.  They are asked to guess at how their last boss in each job would (and might!) rate them.</p>
<p>3.  Motivation to leave.  They are asked whether they quit on their own, were fired, or if it was &#8220;mutual.&#8221;</p>
<p>The combination of the three innovations will make the Topgrading Career History Form even more efficient.  Just email candidates, &#8220;Thank you for sending your resume;  in order to continue the selection process please complete the career history form.&#8221;  A week later you sift through 30 completed career history forms and quickly zero-in on just the candidates who are in the right comp range, who have not been job hoppers, who say their bosses will rate them at least 4 (on a 5-point scale) and who generally have left jobs on their own for better jobs (as opposed to being fired or having too many &#8220;mutual&#8221; departures). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/how-a-players-fail/2008/03/15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Topgrading for Sales is launched</title>
		<link>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/topgrading-for-sales-is-launched/2008/03/02/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/topgrading-for-sales-is-launched/2008/03/02/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 16:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Smart</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/topgrading-for-sales-is-launched/2008/03/02/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is in the &#8220;what&#8217;s new in topgrading&#8221; category.  In May, 2008, the latest of our books, Topgrading for Sales: World-Class Methods to Interview, Hire, and Coach Top Sales Representatives will be released by Portfolio.  Although the basic concepts are standard, I thought you might be interested in knowing:

it&#8217;s short &#8212; a little over 100 pages.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in the &#8220;what&#8217;s new in topgrading&#8221; category.  In May, 2008, the latest of our books, <strong><em>Topgrading for Sales: World-Class Methods to Interview, Hire, and Coach Top Sales Representatives</em> </strong>will be released by Portfolio.  Although the basic concepts are standard, I thought you might be interested in knowing:</p>
<ul>
<li>it&#8217;s short &#8212; a little over 100 pages.  It&#8217;s a practical how-to manual with very little theory, but some impressive case studies.</li>
<li>it includes ROI models.  For years we&#8217;ve known that if only one manager in one workshop avoids one (average) mis-hire, the $500,000 savings produces a sky-high ROI.  Of course, almost every manager trained avoids at least one mis-hire in the next year or two. This little book develops the ROI model nicely.</li>
<li>anticipating release of the book, three pilot programs have been launched &#8212; for Microsoft, Johnson &amp; Johnson, and Paychex.  All three are off to a terrific start! </li>
</ul>
<p>Wow &#8212; sales VPs and managers are super-motivated to topgrade.  They know that almost immediately they can hire more high performers, who will assure higher bonuses for all, and whose improved sales will improve chances that the sales manager will win a promotion.</p>
<p>Stay tuned &#8212; as release approaches we&#8217;ll probably offer a free webinar.  The &#8220;we,&#8221; by the way includes co-author Greg Alexander, who topgraded his sales team at EMC and in one year took his region from #12 (of 14) to #1.  How about that &#8212; an author who has actually &#8220;done&#8221; what the book teaches!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.SmartTopgrading.com/topgrading-for-sales-is-launched/2008/03/02/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
